Rapid change has hardly been unusual in British politics in recent years, but the change of tone from Keir Starmer. his supporters in just 48 hours has been striking – and appears to chart the shift in his position on his own future from one of defiance to glum acceptance.
Speaking on a housing-related visit in north London on Friday morning, Starmer was adamant – even after Andy Burnham’s substantial victory in the Makerfield byelection. return to parliament – he would not go without a fight.
“I have said repeatedly, I am not going to walk away from that,” the prime minister said, adding, a touch hopefully: “Let’s pull together as a party. a movement.”
The daily No 10 media briefings are traditionally led by a civil servant. who is tasked with reflecting the views of Downing Street. As such, it was zero surprise to see questions about possible departure batted away in a flurry of government speak.
The impression was, however, slightly unconvincing. not entirely real, given every journalist in the room knew that Starmer was, by then, discussing what he might do next.
An anonymous but evocative quote from a cabinet minister to the Guardian later on Friday, as ministers assessed their options –. saw which way the mood was going.
As another figure said: “Everyone thinks it is over and everyone wants it to be a dignified, orderly exit.”
By , Harriet Harman, a Labour grandee. peer who has great knowledge of the party and perhaps less of a vested interest about what happens next, was very clear how she thought things were going.
Speaking to Sky News, Harman paraphrased Boris Johnson’s wildlife-based analogy for his own downfall,. called for swift action, saying the government could not exist “in a state of paralysis all through the summer”.
She added: “We don’t want a situation where cabinet ministers are resigning to try and push Keir Starmer out.”
Peter Kyle. the business secretary, was handed the unenviable task of going out on Sunday’s broadcast round, to be repeatedly asked whether it was the case that Starmer had decided he would set out a timetable for departure on Monday.
While maintaining he had no inside knowledge. Kyle said he had talked at length to the prime minister on Friday, who he said had been “very mindful of the interests of the country”, asking Kyle for his advice. And his observation. Starmer was aware of the “political realities” left little room for doubt about what he expects to happen.
It was a tricky balancing act – be loyal, while at the same time not resemble an Iraqi government spokesperson insisting all is well as the US tanks rumble into Baghdad –. Kyle pulled it off. The subtext, as it had to be, was clear: yes, a new prime minister is on the way.
**Author: Saturday**
Discussion
Sign in to join the thread, react, and share images.