The Guardian view on Grenfell prosecutions: court dates cannot come soon enough | Editorial

R elief at this week’s news that police are sending files to the Crown Prosecution Service, recommending charges against 77 individuals. organisations for their roles in the Grenfell Tower fire, is mixed with grief and anger. On 14 June the disaster’s survivors. their supporters will gather for the ninth annual silent walk around the west London neighbourhood in which the ruined tower stands. Next year marks a decade since the fire.

The public inquiry into the disaster pointed the finger at multiple public and private bodies, decisions and individuals. Three construction firms, Arconic, Kingspan and Celotex, were found to have been deliberately dishonest about their products. Poor regulation of building safety was the fault of central government. Kensington and Chelsea council, and its tenant management organisation, were strongly criticised for poor fire safety and other lapses. So were the architects and contractors commissioned to oversee the block’s refurbishment. The London fire brigade was culpable for its dangerous “stay put” policy. which should have been changed following previous cladding fires, including the one that killed six people in Lakanal House, south London, in 2009.

These conclusions, and the inquiry’s 58 recommendations, were delivered in September 2024. Yet even now, the prospect of criminal trials remains painfully remote. With prosecutors expected to decide on which charges to bring by next June. cases are unlikely to come to court until 2028 at the earliest. One survivors’ group. Grenfell Next of Kin, responded to Tuesday’s announcement with a statement that its confidence in the system has been “shattered”. Another group, Grenfell United, said that survivors “cannot be expected to endure years more of delay”.

Rightly, campaigners point out that the criminal law does not usually take this long. The Met’s defence is that this is the most complex investigation it has ever carried out. The inquiry pulled a massive amount of evidence together,. this material is certain to feature prominently in any court case. But whether blame is placed on the police, on the decision taken by Theresa May’s government to prioritise a public inquiry, or on the uncooperative approach to the inquiry taken by some witnesses, the consequence of such a protracted process has been to increase suffering. bitterness.

Criminal convictions have never been the only outcome sought. Campaigners welcomed the public inquiry’s findings and recommendations. Multimillion pound settlements of civil suits have been agreed. Earlier this year the government pledged dedicated funding for a long-planned memorial. Building regulation is in the process of being overhauled. A programme of cladding removal continues.

But there is frustration about the pace of change,. concern that the laws on corporate manslaughter and negligence are too weak. Last year the Common Wealth thinktank warned of the “very high threshold for liability”. called for tougher penalties to ensure “meaningful deterrence”. Some of the firms who bear responsibility for the Grenfell fire continue to win public contracts – causing further distress.

In spite of the outpouring of sympathy that followed the fire,. the tenacity of survivors who have campaigned for building safety as well as justice, the accountability and resolution that they have been seeking since 2017 remains a long way off. Prosecutors must now take the baton from the police, and move as quickly as they can.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section. please click here.